They're not really sequels or prequels rather than just independent adventures of the same character, comparable to the majority of James Bond films. They tell entirely closed and self-consistent stories each and the previous stories have absolutely no bearing on the characters or story of next films. So this on the one hand means, the books themselves don't really build extensively onto each other (or at least not in ways significant enough for the primary story and characters) and also that the films necessarily can't rely too much on previous films without introducing connections not present in the source material.īut aside from theory, the films are indeed entirely independent from each other. Please give answers which include reasoning based on the material of the films, and not just personal opinion.įirst of all, as you have correctly noticed, the films were made in a different order than the books (not only was Angels & Demons filmed after Da Vinci Code, they also jumped over The Lost Symbol, as explained in this related question). Thus I've focused only on the first two films here but if there's any good reason to watch Inferno before one or both of the previous films, then I'd also be interested in that.) (I assume that Inferno should be watched last, given that both the book and the film were released after the other two. watch them in the order intended by the original author Dan Brown - or is it more advisable to watch them in release order? Bearing this in mind, what is the best order in which to watch the Robert Langdon film series?ĭoes Angels & Demons count as a prequel (I assume that, as is the case for the books, it's set before The Da Vinci Code)? Would it make sense to watch this one first, i.e.
#The da vinci code movie series code
But the order was reversed for the film adaptations: the film of The Da Vinci Code was released in 2006 and the film of Angels & Demons only in 2009. The novel Angels & Demons was published in 2000 and followed only in 2003 by the mega-bestselling sequel The Da Vinci Code.
0 kommentar(er)
